Lilian Poling vs Tegan Bush Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Poling has proved more effective, winning 43.35% of points on their second serve compared to Bush's 34.69%. These figures are significant, given their high correlation with match prediction accuracy.

When it comes to return game statistics, Bush has a slight edge in winning 52.1% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Poling has won 50.51%. However, Poling takes the advantage in first serve returns, winning 36.59% of points contrasted with Bush's 34.48%. Both statistics hold a strong correlation to favoring one player over the other in head-to-head encounters.

In terms of pressure handling, Poling has managed to save 46.02% of breakpoints, a statistic that could be pivotal for in-game betting predictions. Bush, on the other hand, has saved 39.29% of breakpoints in recent matches.

Looking at overall performance over the last year, Bush emerges with a higher win rate, securing victory in 60% of matches played (W/L 6/4), whereas Poling has won 54% (W/L 27/23). This provides a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.

On the subject of surface preferences, Poling exhibits their best career surface win percentage on hard courts, winning 53% (W/L 31/27), yet falters on indoor hard courts with a win percentage of 43% (W/L 3/4). Contrarily, Bush sports an impressive 100% win rate on hard courts, albeit from a limited sample size (W/L 1/0), and a 50% win rate on indoor hard surfaces (W/L 5/5).

Regarding player level and tournament participation within the past year, both contestants have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K. Poling won 53.57% of their matches in such events (W/L 15/13), while Bush achieved a 60% win rate (W/L 6/4). Such statistics are crucial as they reflect the level at which each competitor has been consistently performing.

A crucial factor, the quality of opponents over the past 12 months, indicates that Poling has faced players with an average rank of 353.4, whereas Bush's opponents have averaged at a rank of 466.3. This discrepancy in opposing player quality could influence the match prediction in Poling’s favor.

Examining the performance in deciding sets is particularly valuable for live predictions and betting. Poling boasts a 67% success rate in deciding sets over the last 12 months, whereas Bush has triumphed in 100% of their deciding set encounters.

Breakpoint conversion provides another insight crucial for in-game live betting. Poling shows a commanding lead, converting 45.71% of their breakpoint opportunities recently, compared to Bush, who has converted 32.69%.

Based on these comprehensive statistics, Poling seems to have a slight edge in the upcoming match, particularly if the contest extends to a deciding set. The decisive factors being Poling's ability to play against higher-ranked opponents, breakpoint conversion, and resilience under pressure could tip the scales in their favor.